Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Home / What Countries Is It Illegal to Deny the Holocaust

What Countries Is It Illegal to Deny the Holocaust

Post a Comment

Laws against Holocaust denial

Countries with laws confronting Holocaust denial shown in red

16 European countries and Israel take laws against Holocaust denial, the deprival of the systematic genocidal killing of approximately six meg Jews in Europe past Nazi Germany in the 1930s and 1940s. Many countries as well take broader laws that criminalize genocide denial. Amongst the countries that ban Holocaust deprival, Austria, Frg, Hungary, Poland and Romania also ban other elements associated with Nazism, such as the display of Nazi symbols.

Laws against Holocaust denial have been proposed in many other countries (in addition to those nations that have criminalized such acts) including the Usa and the United Kingdom. Such proposed laws have been criticised and faced opposition, nigh significantly from civil rights and human rights advocates who fence that such laws would violate people'due south established rights of freedom of voice communication and freedom of expression. Organizations representing the groups victimized during the Holocaust have generally been split in opinion most such proposed laws.

Some courts in the United States, Federal republic of germany and the Britain accept taken judicial notice that the Holocaust occurred.

Along with genocide denial, attempts to justify genocide are punishable in several countries.

Criticism and commentary [edit]

Scholars take pointed out that countries that specifically ban Holocaust denial generally have legal systems that limit speech in other means, such as banning "hate speech". According to D. D. Guttenplan, this is a split between the "common constabulary countries of the The states, Ireland and many British Commonwealth countries from the civil law countries of continental Europe and Scotland. In ceremonious law countries the law is mostly more proscriptive. Also, under the civil constabulary regime, the judge acts more than as an inquisitor, gathering and presenting prove equally well as interpreting it".[1] Michael Whine argues that Holocaust denial tin inspire violence confronting Jews; he states, "Jews' experience in the post-World War Two era suggests that their rights are best protected in open up and tolerant democracies that actively prosecute all forms of racial and religious hatred".[ii]

János Kis[iii] and in item András Schiffer[4] experience the piece of work of Holocaust deniers should exist protected by a universal right to free speech. An identical argument was used[v] by the Hungarian Constitutional Court (Alkotmánybíróság) led by László Sólyom when it struck down a law against Holocaust denial in 1992. The argument that laws punishing Holocaust deprival are incompatible with the European Convention on Homo Rights and the Universal Declaration of Homo Rights have been rejected past institutions of the Quango of Europe (the European Commission of Human Rights,[6] the European Court of Human Rights[vii]) and also by the United Nations Human Rights Committee.[8]

Historians who oppose such laws include Raul Hilberg,[9] Richard J. Evans, Pierre Vidal-Naquet, and Timothy Garton Ash.[x] Other prominent opponents include Christopher Hitchens, Peter Vocalizer,[eleven] and Noam Chomsky,[12] who wrote:

It seems to me something of a scandal that it is even necessary to contend these issues two centuries later Voltaire dedicated the correct of free expression for views he detested. It is a poor service to the memory of the victims of the holocaust to adopt a central doctrine of their murderers.[13]

An uproar resulted when Serge Thion used ane of Chomsky's essays without explicit permission equally a foreword to a book of Holocaust deprival essays (see Faurisson affair).

In January 2019, in an interview in The New Yorker in connection with the publication of her book, Antisemitism: Here and At present, Holocaust historian Deborah E. Lipstadt expressed her opposition to laws confronting expressing Holocaust denial:

I still am a firm opponent of laws against Holocaust denial. First of all, I'm a pretty trigger-happy abet of the First Amendment. Having been sued for libel, and having had that in my life for near six years, I'grand more than than e'er. Even though libel is not covered past the Start Amendment, [David Irving] wouldn't have been able to sue me in this land because he was a public figure.

But I besides don't recall that these laws are efficacious. Forget the morality – I don't think they work. I think they plow whatever is being outlawed into forbidden fruit. We saw information technology in Germany, when Mein Kampf was released from the embargo on information technology a few years agone. People bought information technology considering suddenly it was something they could go ahold of. I just don't think these laws piece of work. And the tertiary reason I'm opposed to them is I don't want politicians making a decision on what tin can and cannot be said. That scares me enormously.[14]

These laws have as well been criticized on the grounds that education is more than effective than legislation at combating Holocaust denial and that the laws will make martyrs out of those imprisoned for their violation.[15]

Past land [edit]

Australia [edit]

While Australia lacks a specific law against Holocaust denial, Holocaust denial is prosecuted in Australia under various laws confronting "hate speech" and "racial vilification".[16] [17] Fredrick Töben was found guilty at Australia's Federal Court of contempt in 2009 for not following a court order in 2002 to desist from publishing anti-semitic material on his Adelaide Institute website. The material queried whether the Holocaust happened, besides equally the presence of gas chambers at the Auschwitz expiry camps.[18]

Austria [edit]

In Austria, the Verbotsgesetz 1947 provided the legal framework for the procedure of denazification in Austria and suppression of any potential revival of Nazism. In 1992, information technology was amended to prohibit the denial or gross minimisation of the Holocaust.

National Socialism Prohibition Law (1947, amendments of 1992)

§ 3g. He who operates in a manner characterized other than that in § § 3a – 3f volition be punished (revitalising of the NSDAP or identification with), with imprisonment from one to upwards to ten years, and in cases of specially unsafe suspects or activeness, be punished with up to 20 years' imprisonment.[19]

§ 3h. As an amendment to § 3 chiliad., whoever denies, grossly plays down, approves or tries to excuse the National Socialist genocide or other National Socialist crimes against humanity in a impress publication, in broadcast or other media.[20]

Belgium [edit]

In Kingdom of belgium, Holocaust denial was made illegal in 1995.

Negationism Law (1995, amendments of 1999)

Article one Whoever, in the circumstances given in article 444 of the Penal Code denies, grossly minimises, attempts to justify, or approves the genocide committed past the High german National Socialist Regime during the 2nd World War shall be punished by a prison house sentence of eight days to i yr, and by a fine of twenty six francs to 5 one thousand francs. For the application of the previous paragraph, the term genocide is meant in the sense of commodity 2 of the International Treaty of 9 Dec 1948 on preventing and combating genocide. In the event of repetitions, the guilty party may in addition have his borough rights suspended in accordance with article 33 of the Penal Code.

Art.2 In the event of a confidence on business relationship of a violation under this Act, it may exist ordered that the sentence, in its entity or an excerpt of it, is published in one of more newspapers, and is displayed, to the charge of the guilty party.

Art.3. Chapter VII of the Commencement Volume of the Penal Lawmaking and Article 85 of the same Code are also applicable to this Act.

Fine art. four. The Center for Equal Opportunities and Opposition to Racism, as well as whatever association that at the time of the facts had a legal personality for at least five years, and which, on the grounds of its statutes, has the objective of defending moral interests and the honor of the resistance or the deported, may act in law in all legal disputes arising from the application of this Act.[21]

Bosnia and Herzegovina [edit]

In May 2007 Ekrem Ajanovic, a Bosniak MP in the Bosnian Parliament proposed legislation on criminalizing denial of the Holocaust, genocide and crimes against humanity, the first time a lawmaker in Bosnia and Herzegovina had made such a suggestion. Bosnian Serb MPs voted against it, proposing issue should be resolved within the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina.[22] Following this, on 6 May 2009 Bosniak MPs Adem Huskic, Ekrem Ajanovic and Remzija Kadric proposed to parliament a alter to the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina where Holocaust, genocide and crimes against humanity denial would be criminalized.[23] Bosnian Serb MPs have repeatedly been confronting such a legislation challenge that the law "would cause disagreement and even animosity" according to SNSD member Lazar Prodanovic.[24]

On July 23, 2021, the High Representative of Bosnia and herzegovina Valentin Inzko passed a police force using the Bonn Powers given to him banning the denial of Genocides, Crimes confronting Humanity and State of war Crimes.[25]

Brazil [edit]

While holocaust denial is not explicitly prohibited in Brazilian constabulary, precedents tend to lead to confidence. Every bit of 11 February 2022, several bills criminalizing the human action are pending in Congress.[26]

Czech Republic [edit]

In the Czech Republic, Holocaust denial and denial of communist-perpetrated atrocities is illegal.

Law Against Support and Dissemination of Movements Oppressing Human Rights and Freedoms (2001)

§ 405 Anyone who publicly denies, disputes, approves or attempts to justify a Nazi, Communist or other genocide or Nazi, Communist or other crimes against humanity or war crimes or crimes confronting peace will exist punished by imprisonment for six months to three years.[27]

France [edit]

In French republic, the Gayssot Deed, voted for on July 13, 1990, makes it illegal to question the existence of crimes that fall in the category of crimes against humanity as defined in the London Charter of 1945, on the footing of which Nazi leaders were convicted past the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg in 1945–46. When the act was challenged by Robert Faurisson, the Human Rights Committee upheld it as a necessary means to counter possible antisemitism.[28] Similarly, the applications of Pierre Marais and Roger Garaudy were rejected by the European Court of Human Rights, in 1996 and 2003.[29]

In 2012, the Ramble Quango of France ruled that to extend the Gayssot Act to the Armenian genocide denial was unconstitutional because it violated the freedom of speech.[xxx] [31] The Gayssot Act itself, all the same, was found consistent with the Constitution four years later on.[32]

Law No 90-615 to repress acts of racism, anti-semitism and xenophobia (1990)

MODIFICATIONS OF THE LAW OF JULY 29, 1881 ON THE Freedom OF THE Press Fine art viii. – Commodity 24 of the Law on the Freedom of the Press of 29 July 1881 is supplemented by the following provisions: In the consequence of judgment for one of the facts envisaged past the preceding subparagraph, the courtroom will be able moreover to order: Except when the responsibleness for the author of the infringement is retained on the base for commodity 42 and the offset subparagraph for article 43 for this police or the start three subparagraphs for article 93-3 for the law No 82-652 for July 29, 1982 on the audio-visual advice, the deprivation of the rights enumerated to the 2o and 3o of article 42 of the penal code for imprisonment of five years maximum;

Fine art nine. – As an subpoena to Commodity 24 of the police force of July 29, 1881 on the freedom of the press, article 24 (a) is written as follows:

Art. 24 (a). – […] those who have disputed the being of i or more than crimes against humanity such as they are divers by Article 6 of the statute of the international tribunal military annexed in the agreement of London of August eight, 1945 and which were carried out either by the members of an organization declared criminal pursuant to Article 9 of the same statute, or by a person plant guilty such crimes past a French or international jurisdiction shall exist punished by i calendar month to i year's imprisonment or a fine.

Art 13. – It is inserted, after article 48-1 of the law of July 29, 1881 on the freedom of the press, article 48-2 thus written:

Art. 48-ii. – […] publication or publicly expressed stance encouraging those to whom information technology is addressed to pass a favourable moral judgment on ane or more crimes against humanity and tending to justify these crimes (including collaboration) or vindicate their perpetrators shall exist punished past one to v years' imprisonment or a fine.[33]

Germany [edit]

§ 130 Incitement to hatred [edit]

In Germany, Volksverhetzung ("incitement of the people")[34] [35] is a concept in German criminal law that bans incitement to hatred against segments of the population. Information technology often applies to (though not limited to) trials relating to Holocaust denial in Federal republic of germany. In addition, Strafgesetzbuch § 86a outlaws various symbols of "unconstitutional organisations", such as Nazi symbolism or the ISIL flag.

§ 130 Incitement to hatred (1985, Revised 1992, 2002, 2005, 2015) [36] [37]

(1) Whosoever, in a manner capable of disturbing the public peace:

  1. incites hatred against a national, racial, religious group or a group defined by their ethnic origins, against segments of the population or individuals because of their belonging to one of the aforementioned groups or segments of the population or calls for violent or arbitrary measures against them; or
  2. assaults the human being nobility of others by insulting, maliciously maligning an aforementioned group, segments of the population or individuals because of their belonging to one of the aforementioned groups or segments of the population, or defaming segments of the population,

shall be liable to imprisonment from three months to five years.[36] [37]

[…]

(3) Whosoever publicly or in a meeting approves of, denies or downplays an act committed under the rule of National Socialism of the kind indicated in section 6 (1) of the Code of International Criminal Law, in a manner capable of disturbing the public peace shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding v years or a fine.[36] [37]

(4) Whoever publicly or in a meeting disturbs the public peace in a manner which violates the nobility of the victims by approving of, glorifying or justifying National Socialist tyranny and capricious rule incurs a penalty of imprisonment for a term non exceeding three years or a fine.[36] [37]

The definition of section half-dozen of the Code of Crimes confronting International Police referenced in the in a higher place § 130 is as follows:

§ 6 Genocide

(one) Whoever with the intent of destroying as such, in whole or in part, a national, racial, religious or ethnic group:

  1. kills a member of the group,
  2. causes serious bodily or mental harm to a member of the group, specially of the kind referred to in section 226 of the Criminal Lawmaking,
  3. inflicts on the group conditions of life calculated to bring most their concrete destruction in whole or in function,
  4. imposes measures intended to prevent births within the group,
  5. forcibly transfers a child of the group to some other group, shall be punished with imprisonment for life. […][38]

Other sections [edit]

The following sections of the German criminal code are besides relevant:

§ 189 Disparagement of the Retentivity of Deceased Persons (1985, amendments of 1992)
Whoever disparages the memory of a deceased person shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than two years or a fine.[39]

§ 194 Application for Criminal Prosecution

(ane) An insult shall exist prosecuted only upon complaint. If the human activity was committed through dissemination of writings (Section 11 subsection (3)) or making them publicly accessible in a meeting or through a presentation by radio, then a complaint is not required if the aggrieved party was persecuted as a member of a group under the National Socialist or another rule by strength and decree, this group is a function of the population and the insult is connected with this persecution. The act may not, still, be prosecuted ex officio if the aggrieved party objects. When the aggrieved political party deceases, the rights of complaint and of objection devolve on the relatives indicated in Section 77 subsection (two). The objection may not be withdrawn.

(2) If the memory of a deceased person has been disparaged, so the relatives indicated in Section 77 subsection (2), are entitled to file a complaint. If the act was committed through broadcasting of writings (Section 11 subsection (3)) or making them publicly accessible in a coming together or through a presentation by radio, then a complaint is not required if the deceased person lost his life as a victim of the National Socialist or some other rule by forcefulness and decree and the disparagement is connected therewith. The act may not, however, be prosecuted ex officio if a person entitled to file a complaint objects. The objection may non exist withdrawn. […][forty]

Judicial discover [edit]

The German Federal Supreme Courtroom has, in at least one case, taken judicial notice that the Holocaust occurred.[41]

Hellenic republic [edit]

In September 2014, with a vote of 54 out of 99 present of the 300-fellow member Hellenic Parliament (the torso was in summertime session at the time), Greece amended its 1979 police 'On the penalization of actions or activities intending unto racial discrimination' (N.927/1979) to make malicious denial of the Holocaust and other crimes against humanity for the purposes of inciting violence, bigotry or hatred or by way of threat or insult, a criminal criminal offence.[42] In contrast to other European countries, the Greek constabulary is non a blanket ban on expressing the stance that a genocide did not take place, but rather requires an boosted status of intending to cause violence, incite hatred or threaten or insult a protected group.

Constabulary 927/1979 (as amended past Law 4285/2014)

Commodity 1 – Public incitement of violence or hatred

1. Whoever intentionally, publicly, verbally or in print, over the net or through any other medium or means, incites, causes, arouses or solicits acts or activities which are capable of causing discrimination, hatred or violence against a person or group of persons, who are identified on the bases of race, color, faith, genealogical background, national or indigenous origins, sexual orientation, gender identity or inability, in a mode that endangers public gild or poses a threat to the life, liberty or actual integrity of such persons, shall be imprisoned for betwixt three months and (3) years and fined betwixt five and twenty g (v.000 - 20.000) euros.

[…]

Commodity 2 – Public approval or denial or crimes

ane. Whoever intentionally, publicly, verbally or in impress, over the net or through any other medium or means, approves, ridicules or maliciously denies the existence or seriousness of crimes of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, the Holocaust and other crimes of Nazism which have been recognised past decisions of international courts or the Hellenic Parliament and this behaviour is targeted confronting a group of people, or member thereof, which is identified on the footing of race, color, religion, genealogical background, national or ethnic origins, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability, when this behaviour is expressed in a style that is capable of inciting violence or hatred or is of a threatening or insulting character against such a group or a fellow member thereof, is subject to the penalties of paragraph i of the previous article.[43]

This law was harshly criticised at the time of its passage for its vague language and alleged infringement of freedom of expression. In a letter of the alphabet signed by 139 Greek historians, they argued that "as international experience has shown, such provisions lead down unsafe paths: they critically wound the democratic and inalienable right to freedom of speech, while simultaneously non being at all effective in terms of fighting racism and Nazism. Indeed, they ofttimes pb to the contrary result, allowing the enemies of democracy to present themselves to public opinion equally "victims" of censorship and authoritarianism. The conditions set up along in the bill, being highly vague and fluid, are unfortunately not a guarantee."[44]

The first prosecution under Article two of the law was brought against German historian Heinz A. Richter, who was tried in absentia for denying Nazi atrocities in Crete during World War Ii. The court plant Richter not guilty on the grounds that, while his work was proven to contain historical inaccuracies, there was no prove he intended to incite hatred against the people of Crete [45] and that the 2014 police was unconstitutional, as it violated the principle of freedom of speech.[46] Though the finding of unconstitutionality is not finally binding, as it was issued by a court of first case, as of March 2018, no one has been successfully convicted in Greece for genocide denial under this law.[47]

Republic of hungary [edit]

The National Associates of Hungary declared the deprival or trivialization of the Holocaust a criminal offense punishable by up to three years' imprisonment on February 23, 2010.[48] The police was signed by President László Sólyom in March 2010.[49] On June 8, 2010, the newly elected Fidesz-dominated parliament changed the conception of the police force to "punish those, who deny the genocides committed past national socialist or communist systems, or deny other facts of deeds against humanity".[50]

In 2011, the first man was charged with Holocaust deprival in Budapest. The Courtroom sentenced the man to xviii months in prison, suspended for three years, and probation. He also had to visit either Budapest's memorial museum, Auschwitz or Yad Vashem in Jerusalem. He chose his local Holocaust Memorial Center and had to make three visits in total and record his observations.[51]

In January 2015, the court ordered far-right on-line newspaper Kuruc.info to delete its article denying the Holocaust published in July 2013, which was the first ruling in Hungary of its kind.[52] The Association for Civil Liberties (TASZ) offered free legal aid to the website as a protest against restrictions on freedom of speech,[53] but the site refused citing the liberal views of the clan, and also refused to delete the article.[54]

Israel [edit]

In Israel, a police to criminalize Holocaust deprival was passed by the Knesset on July 8, 1986.

Denial of Holocaust (Prohibition) Constabulary, 5746-1986

Definitions i. In this Police force, "law-breaking against the Jewish people" and "crime against humanity" have the same respective meanings as in the "Nazis and Nazi Collaborators Police", 5710-1950.

Prohibition of Denial of Holocaust ii. A person who, in writing or past discussion of mouth, publishes whatever statement denying or diminishing the proportions of acts committed in the menstruation of the Nazi regime, which are crimes against the Jewish people or crimes against humanity, with intent to defend the perpetrators of those acts or to express sympathy or identification with them, shall be liable to imprisonment for a term of v years.

Prohibition of publication of expression for sympathy for Nazi crimes iii. A person who, in writing or by word of oral cavity, publishes any statement expressing praise or sympathy for or identification with acts done in the period of the Nazi regime, which are crimes against the Jewish people or crimes against humanity, shall exist liable to imprisonment for a term of five years.

Permitted publication 4. The publication of a right and off-white report of a publication prohibited past this Police shall not be regarded as an offence thereunder so long as it is non fabricated with intent to express sympathy or identification with the perpetrators of crimes against the Jewish people or against humanity.

Filing of charge 5. An indictment for offences nether this Law shall only exist filed by or with the consent of the Chaser-General.[55]

Italian republic [edit]

The Italian parliament, extending an anti-racism constabulary from 1975, approved Law 16 June 2016 n. 115, criminalizing the spreading of Holocaust denial and making conviction for the crime subject to imprisonment for 2 to half-dozen years.[56] [57]

Liechtenstein [edit]

Although not specifically outlining national socialist crimes, item 5 of department 283 of Liechtenstein's criminal lawmaking prohibits the deprival of genocide.

§ 283 Race discrimination Whoever publicly denies, coarsely trivialises, or tries to justify genocide or other crimes against humanity via discussion, writing, pictures, electronically transmitted signs, gestures, violent acts or by other ways shall be punished with imprisonment for upwardly to two years.[58]

Lithuania [edit]

In Republic of lithuania, approval and denial of Nazi or Soviet crimes is prohibited.

170(2) Publicly condoning international crimes, crimes of the USSR or Nazi Federal republic of germany against the Republic of Lithuania and her inhabitants, deprival or belittling of such crimes. [59]

Luxembourg [edit]

In Grand duchy of luxembourg, Article 457-3 of the Criminal Code, Act of nineteen July 1997 outlaws Holocaust denial and deprival of other genocides.[60] The punishment is imprisonment for between 8 days and 6 months and/or a fine.[60] The offence of "negationism and revisionism" applies to:

...anyone who has contested, minimised, justified or denied the existence of state of war crimes or crimes against humanity as defined in the statutes of the International Military Tribunal of 8 August 1945 or the beingness of a genocide every bit defined by the Act of eight Baronial 1985. A complaint must exist lodged by the person confronting whom the offence was committed (victim or association) in gild for proceedings to be brought, Commodity 450 of the Criminal Code, Act of xix July 1997.[60]

Netherlands [edit]

While Holocaust denial is non explicitly illegal in holland, the courts consider it a form of spreading hatred and therefore an offence.[61] Co-ordinate to the Dutch public prosecution office, offensive remarks are only punishable past Dutch law if they equate to bigotry confronting a item group.[62] The relevant laws of the Dutch penal lawmaking are as follows:

Article 137c

  1. He who in public, either verbally or in writing or prototype, deliberately offends a group of people because of their race, their religion or beliefs, their hetero- or homosexual orientation or their concrete, psychological or mental handicap, shall be punished with imprisonment not exceeding one year or a fine of the third category. [...][63]

Commodity 137d

  1. He who in public, either verbally or in writing or image, incites hatred or discrimination against people or incites acts of violence towards people or property of people considering of their race, their religion or beliefs, their gender, their hetero- or homosexual orientation or their physical, psychological or mental handicap, shall be punished with imprisonment not exceeding 1 year or a fine of the third category. [...][64]

Poland [edit]

In Poland, Holocaust denial and the denial of communist crimes is punishable past constabulary.

Act of eighteen December 1998 on the Institute of National Remembrance – Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes confronting the Polish Nation (Dz.U. 1998 nr 155 poz. 1016)

Article 55
He who publicly and contrary to facts contradicts the crimes mentioned in Commodity 1, clause i shall be bailiwick to a fine or a penalty of deprivation of freedom of up to three years. The judgment shall exist made publicly known.

Article i
This Act shall govern:
1. the registration, collection, admission, management and utilize of the documents of the organs of state security created and nerveless between 22 July 1944 and 31 Dec 1989, and the documents of the organs of security of the 3rd Reich and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics apropos:

a) crimes perpetrated against persons of Polish nationality and Polish citizens of other ethnicity, nationalities in the period betwixt 1 September 1939 and 31 December 1989:
- Nazi crimes,
- communist crimes,
- other crimes constituting crimes against peace, crimes against humanity or state of war crimes
b) other politically motivated repressive measures committed by functionaries of Polish prosecution bodies or the judiciary or persons acting upon their orders, and disclosed in the content of the rulings given pursuant to the Human action of 23 February 1991 on the Acknowledgement as Null and Void Decisions Delivered on Persons Repressed for Activities for the Benefit of the Independent Polish State (Journal of Laws of 1993 No. 34, particular 149, of 1995 No. 36, detail 159, No. 28, particular 143, and of 1998 No. 97, item 604),

two. the rules of procedure as regards the prosecution of crimes specified in point 1 letter a),
3. the protection of the personal data of grieved parties, and

4. the conduct of activities every bit regards public education.[65]

Portugal [edit]

Although denial of the Holocaust is not expressly illegal in Portugal, Portuguese law prohibits deprival of war crimes if used to incite to discrimination.

Article 240: Racial, religious, or sexual discrimination

[…]

ii — Whoever in a public meeting, in writing intended for broadcasting, or past any means of mass media or calculator system whose purpose is to disseminate:

[…]
b) defames or slanders an individual or grouping of individuals because of race, colour, indigenous or national origin, or religion, particularly through the deprival of war crimes or those against peace and humanity;
[…]

with intent to incite to racial, religious or sexual discrimination or to encourage it, shall exist punished with imprisonment from vi months to five years.[66]

Romania [edit]

In Romania, Emergency Ordinance No. 31 of March 13, 2002 prohibits Holocaust denial. It was ratified on May vi, 2006. The law besides prohibits racist, fascist, xenophobic symbols, uniforms and gestures: proliferation of which is punishable with imprisonment from between half-dozen months to v years.

Emergency Ordinance No. 31 of March thirteen, 2002

[...]

Article 3. – (1) Establishing a fascist, racist or xenophobic organisation is punishable by imprisonment from 5 to 15 years and the loss of certain rights.

[...]

Article 4. – (1) The dissemination, sale or manufacture of symbols either fascist, racist or xenophobic, and possession of such symbols is punished with imprisonment from 6 months to 5 years and the loss of certain rights.

[...]

Article 5. – Promoting the culture of persons guilty of committing a criminal offence confronting peace and humanity or promoting fascist, racist or xenophobic ideology, through propaganda, committed by any means, in public, is punishable past imprisonment from 6 months to 5 years and the loss of sure rights.

Article half dozen. – Deprival of the Holocaust in public, or to the effects thereof is punishable by imprisonment from 6 months to 5 years and the loss of certain rights.[67]

In 2021, the first sentence over Holocaust denial was made in Romania. The accused was Vasile Zărnescu, a former Romanian Intelligence Service (SRI) member who published several articles and a book confronting the veracity of the Holocaust.[68]

Russia [edit]

In May 2014, Russia'south President Vladimir Putin signed a police force making the deprival of Nazi crimes and "wittingly spreading false information about the activity of the USSR during the years of World War 2" or portraying Nazis equally heroes a crime.[69]

Slovakia [edit]

In Slovakia, Holocaust denial has been a crime since 2001 (police 485/2001), and the penal law (300/2005) specifies in §422d that "who publicly denies, denies, approves or tries to justify the Holocaust, crimes of regimes based on fascist credo, crimes of regimes based on communist credo or crimes of other similar movements that employ violence, the threat of violence or the threat of other serious harm with the aim of suppressing the fundamental rights and freedoms of persons shall be punished by imprisonment of vi months to three years".

Spain [edit]

Genocide deprival was illegal in Spain until the Constitutional Court of Espana ruled that the words "deny or" were unconstitutional in its sentence of November 7, 2007.[lxx] As a result, Holocaust denial is legal in Spain, although justifying the Holocaust or whatever other genocide is an offence punishable by imprisonment in accordance with the constitution.[71]

PENAL Code- BOOK Two, TITLE XXIV Crimes against the International Customs


Chapter II: Crimes of genocide – Article 607.1

1. Those who, with the intention to total or partially destroy a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, perpetrate the following acts, will exist punished:

1) With the prison sentence of fifteen to twenty years, if they killed to some of its members.
If the fact 2 or more than aggravating circumstances concurred in, the greater punishment in caste volition prevail.
2) With the prison of fifteen to twenty years, if they sexually attacked to some of members [of the grouping] or produced some of the injuries anticipated in article 149.
3) With prison sentence of 8 to fifteen years, if they subjected the group or anyone of its individuals to atmospheric condition of being that put their lives in danger or seriously disturbed their health, or when they produced some to them of the injuries anticipated in article 150.
iv) With the aforementioned punishment, if they carried out [unavoidable] displacements of the grouping or their members, they adopted any measurement that tend to prevent their sort of life or reproduction, or transferred by force individuals from a group to another one.
five) With imprisonment of iv to viii years, if they produced any other injury different from the ones indicated in numbers two) and 3) of this section.

2. The diffusion by any means of ideas or doctrines that deny or justify the crimes in the previous department of this article, or tries the rehabilitation of regimes or institutions which they protect generating practices of such, will be punished with a prison sentence of one to two years.[72]

Switzerland [edit]

Holocaust denial is non expressly illegal in Switzerland, just the deprival of genocide and other crimes confronting humanity is an imprisonable offence.

Fine art. 261bis ane

Racial bigotry

Whoever publicly, past word, writing, image, gesture, acts of violence or any other manner, demeans or discriminates confronting an individual or a grouping of individuals because of their race, their ethnicity or their organized religion in a way which undermines human dignity, or on those bases, denies, coarsely minimizes or seeks to justify a genocide or other crimes against humanity [...] shall be punished with upwardly to three years' imprisonment or a fine.[73]

Ukraine [edit]

In September 2020, the Verkhovna Rada passed a law defining antisemitism and banning it in the land. This constabulary includes denying the mass extermination of Jews in the Holocaust as function of its definition of antisemitism.[74]

United Kingdom [edit]

There is no statute in the United Kingdom making Holocaust denial illegal, however judicial detect that the Holocaust occurred was taken in the case of R v Chabloz and the defendant in that case was charged with sharing 'grossly offensive' material related to Holocaust denial. Some contend that this judgements sets a precedent for Holocaust denial related material being accounted "grossly offensive" and contrary to the Communications Act 2007.[75]

United States [edit]

In the Us, Holocaust deprival is constitutionally protected free speech because of the First Subpoena.[76]

A United States court in 1981, in a example brought by Mel Mermelstein, took judicial notice of the occurrence of gassings in Auschwitz during the Holocaust, declaring that a legally incontestable fact.[77] [78]

European union [edit]

The European Spousal relationship's Executive Commission proposed a European Matrimony-wide anti-racism xenophobia constabulary in 2001, which included the criminalization of Holocaust denial. On July 15, 1996, the Council of the Eu adopted the Joint action/96/443/JHA concerning activeness to combat racism and xenophobia.[79] [lxxx] During the German presidency in that location was an attempt to extend this ban.[81] Total implementation was blocked by the United kingdom and the Nordic countries because of the need to balance the restrictions on voicing racist opinions against the freedom of expression.[82] As a outcome, a compromise has been reached inside the EU and while the European union has not prohibited Holocaust denial outright, a maximum term of three years in jail is optionally available to all member nations for "denying or grossly trivialising crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes".[83] [84]

The Eu extradition policy regarding Holocaust denial was tested in the Uk during the 2008 failed extradition case brought confronting the suspected Holocaust denier Fredrick Töben[85] past the High german government. As there is no specific crime of Holocaust deprival in the Britain, the German government had applied for Töben's extradition for racial and xenophobic crimes. Töben'southward extradition was refused by the Westminster Magistrates' Court, and the German regime withdrew its appeal to the High Courtroom.

European Wedlock Framework Determination for Combating Racism and Xenophobia (2007)

The text establishes that the following intentional acquit will be punishable in all EU Member States:

- Publicly inciting to violence or hatred, even by dissemination or distribution of tracts, pictures or other cloth, directed against a group of persons or a member of such a grouping defined by reference to race, colour, faith, descent or national or ethnic origin.
- Publicly condoning, denying or grossly trivialising
- crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes as defined in the Statute of the International Criminal Court (Articles 6, 7 and 8) directed against a group of persons or a fellow member of such a group defined by reference to race, colour, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin, and
- crimes defined by the Tribunal of Nuremberg (Article half dozen of the Charter of the International Military Tribunal, London Agreement of 1945) directed against a group of persons or a fellow member of such a group divers by reference to race, colour, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin.

Member States may choose to punish only conduct which is either carried out in a manner likely to disturb public order or which is threatening, abusive or insulting.

The reference to religion is intended to cover, at least, conduct which is a pretext for directing acts against a group of persons or a fellow member of such a group divers past reference to race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin.

Member States volition ensure that these conducts are punishable past criminal penalties of a maximum of at least between 1 and 3 years of imprisonment.[86]

2019 European Court of Human Rights conclusion [edit]

On October three, 2019, in the case Pastörs v. Germany (application no. 55225/14),[87] the European Court of Homo Rights (ECHR) unanimously ruled that a determination of the German courts determining that the argument fabricated by the German politician, Udo Pastörs, that "the then-chosen Holocaust is being used for political and commercial purposes" as well every bit other Holocaust denial comments were a violation of the memory of the expressionless and an intentional defamation of the Jewish people and that the courts had not violated Article 10 (liberty of expression) of the European Convention on Man Rights in convicting him for this offense. Furthermore, the ECHR decided past four votes to iii that there had been no violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) of the European Convention on Human being Rights.[88]

Prosecutions and convictions [edit]

Laws against Holocaust denial accept been enforced in most jurisdictions that have them. Convictions and sentencings include:

Date Name State where the sentence was pronounced Judgement
September 1987, June 1999, Apr 2016 Jean-Marie Le Pen France, Germany fines of €183,000 (1987), €6,000 (1999)[89] and €30,000 (2016)[90]
Feb. 27, 1998 Roger Garaudy French republic 6 months' imprisonment (suspended), ₣240,000 (€37,500) fine[91]
Jul. 21, 1998 Jürgen Graf Switzerland 15 months' imprisonment (fled Switzerland to avert sentence)[92]
Jul. 21, 1998 Gerhard Förster Switzerland 12 months' imprisonment, disgorgement[93]
April eight, 1999 Fredrick Töben Commonwealth of australia 7 months' imprisonment Mannheim, Germany – retrial – 2011 indefinitely stayed past judge Dr Meinerzhagen. October i – November 19, 2008, London, extradition to Mannheim, Deutschland, on European Arrest Warrant issued by Germany, failed. August 15 – November 12, 2009, Adelaide, Australia – for contempt of court because he refused to cease questioning the Holocaust's 3 nuts: half dozen million, systematic country extermination, gas chambers as murder weapon.
May 27, 1999 Jean Plantin France 6 months' imprisonment (suspended), fine, amercement[94]
Apr. 11, 2000 Gaston-Armand Amaudruz Switzerland 1 year'due south imprisonment, damages[95]
February. 20, 2006 David Irving Austria iii years' imprisonment.[96] Released and deported after serving 13 months.
Mar. 15, 2006 Germar Rudolf Federal republic of germany ii½ years' imprisonment[97]
Oct. three, 2006 Robert Faurisson France €vii,500 fine, 3 months' probation[98]
February. 15, 2007 Ernst Zündel Germany 5 years' imprisonment[99]
November. 8, 2007 Vincent Reynouard French republic 1 year's imprisonment and a fine of 10,000 euros[100]
January. 14, 2008 Wolfgang Fröhlich Austria 6 years' imprisonment (tertiary offence)[101]
Jan. 15, 2008 Sylvia Stolz Frg 3½ years' imprisonment[102]
Mar. 11, 2009 Horst Mahler Germany 5 years' imprisonment[103]
Oct. 23, 2009 Dirk Zimmerman Germany 9 months' imprisonment[104]
Oct. 27, 2009 Richard Williamson Frg €12,000 fine[105] (afterward overturned)[ citation needed ]
Aug. 16, 2012 Udo Pastörs Germany 8-calendar month' imprisonment, suspended on probation.[106]
January. 31, 2013 Gyorgy Nagy Hungary 18-month suspended jail sentence[107]
February. 11, 2015 Vincent Reynouard France 2 years' imprisonment[108]
Nov. 12, 2015 Ursula Haverbeck Germany 10 months' imprisonment[109]

Run into besides [edit]

  • Anti-fascism
  • Criticism of Holocaust denial
  • Freedom of expression
  • Genocide recognition politics
  • Thoughtcrime
  • Secondary antisemitism
  • Armenian genocide denial#Legality
  • Rwandan genocide denial, which is illegal in Rwanda[110]

References [edit]

  1. ^ D D Guttenplan, Should Liberty of Voice communication Stop at Holocaust Denial? Archived Jan fifteen, 2008, at the Wayback Car, Alphabetize of Free Expression, 2005.
  2. ^ Whine, Michael (Spring 2008), Expanding Holocaust Denial and Legislation Confronting It, Jewish Political Studies Review
  3. ^ János Kis: Szólássabadság és náci beszéd, Népszabadság, March 30, 1996.
  4. ^ Fogadatlan prókátorok – A gárdaítélet félreértelmezéseiről, Magyar Narancs, July 23, 2009
  5. ^ "Alkotmánybíróság - Kezdőlap" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 April 2016. Retrieved 6 April 2016.
  6. ^ 10. five. Federal Commonwealth of Frg (European Commission of Human Rights 16 July 1982).
  7. ^ Lehideux and Isorni five. French republic , 1998-VII, no. 92; application number 24662/94, case number 55/1997/839/1045 (European Courtroom of Human Rights 23 September 1998).
  8. ^ Faurisson five French republic , ii BHRC United nations Doc. CCPR/C/58/D/550/1993, 1 (United Nations Human Rights Committee 1996).
  9. ^ "Is At that place a New Anti-Semitism? A Chat with Raul Hilberg". Logos. vi (one–2). Winter–Spring 2007. Archived from the original on 7 June 2007. Retrieved 30 July 2012. I have come to the conclusion, not once but several times, that, every bit far equally I am concerned, I do non concord with legislation that makes it illegal to utter pronouncements challenge that there was no Holocaust. I do not want to muzzle any of this because information technology is a sign of weakness non of strength when you try to shut somebody upwards.
  10. ^ Garton Ash, Timothy (nineteen October 2006). "This is the moment for Europe to dismantle taboos, not cock them". The Guardian. London. Retrieved thirty July 2012.
  11. ^ Singer, Peter (1 March 2006). "David Irving has a correct to free speech communication, too". JPost.com. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
  12. ^ Chomsky, Noam (28 February 1981). "His Right to Say It". The Nation. Archived from the original on ten October 2014. Retrieved thirty July 2012. [I]t is elementary that freedom of expression (including academic freedom) is not to be restricted to views of which ane approves, and that it is precisely in the case of views that are almost universally despised and condemned that this right must be most vigorously defended.
  13. ^ Chomsky, Noam. "His Right to Say It". Noam Chomsky website. Retrieved 16 February 2015.
  14. ^ Chotiner, Isaac (January 24, 2019) "Looking at Anti-Semitism on the Left and the Right: An Interview with Deborah E. Lipstadt" The New Yorker
  15. ^ Adam Lebor (March 25, 2010), A bad police against Holocaust denial, Jewish Chronicle
  16. ^ Ben Collins (26 March 2014). "George Brandis: Holocaust Deprival Would Not Get Legal Under My New Laws". Business Insider Australia . Retrieved half dozen April 2016.
  17. ^ "Racial Discrimination Human action changes would allow Holocaust denial, says Shane Rattenbury". The Historic period. v May 2014. Retrieved 6 April 2016.
  18. ^ "Holocaust denier Fredrick Toben jailed in Australia". The Daily Telegraph. London. Baronial 14, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2020.
  19. ^ "Verbotsgesetz 1945 in der Fassung des NSG 1947" (in German). Austrian Research Center for Post-War Trials. Retrieved 2009-05-29 .
  20. ^ "Verfassungsgesetz vom viii. Mai 1945 über das Verbot der NSDAP (Verbotsgesetz 1947) in der Fassung der Verbotsgesetznovelle 1992" (in German). Austrian Research Centre for Post-State of war Trials. Retrieved 2009-05-29 .
  21. ^ "23 MARS 1995. – Loi tendant à réprimer la négation, la minimisation, la justification ou l'approbation du génocide commis par le régime national-socialiste allemand pendant la seconde guerre mondiale" (in French). juridat.be. Retrieved 2009-05-29 .
  22. ^ PORICANJE GENOCIDA PROGLASITI KRIVIČNIM DJELOM, Prof. dr. Fikret Karcic, Preporod, 5.7.2007 Archived September 19, 2009, at the Wayback Motorcar
  23. ^ "24sata.info - Stranka za BiH: Krivičnim zakonom BiH obuhvatiti genocid i holokaust". Archived from the original on 28 July 2011. Retrieved 6 April 2016.
  24. ^ Dzidic, Denis (27 January 2009). "Bosnia'south Etnic Tensions Delay Holocaust Denial Constabulary". Balkan Investigative Reporting Network. Archived from the original on 2009-09-16. Retrieved 2016-06-28 .
  25. ^ "HR's Determination on Enacting the Constabulary on Amendment to the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina". Office of the High Representative. 2021-07-23. Retrieved 2021-07-23 .
  26. ^ "É proibido se dizer nazista ou negar Holocausto no Brasil? O que dizem leis e especialistas" [Is it forbidden to call oneself Nazi or deny the Holocaust in Brazil? What laws and experts say]. BBC Brasil (in Portuguese). 11 February 2022. Retrieved xvi February 2022.
  27. ^ Naamat, Talis; Osin, Nina; and Porat, Dina (eds.) (2012) Legislating for Equality: A Multinational Collection of Non-Bigotry Norms. Volume I: Europe Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. pp.117-120 ISBN 9789004227590
  28. ^ "Communication No 550/1993 : France. 16/12/96. CCPR/C/58/D/550/1993. (Jurisprudence)". United Nations Function of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved 2009-05-29 .
  29. ^ ECHR, Marais c. French republic, north° 31159/96, 25 June 1996; Garaudy v. France, No 65831/01, 24 June 2003.
  30. ^ Libération, La loi contre la négation du génocide arménien est censurée [ane]
  31. ^ Constitutional Council, Determination no. 2012-647 DC of 28 FEBRUARY 2012
  32. ^ Décision n° 2015-512 QPC du viii janvier 2016
  33. ^ "Loi northward°ninety-615 du xiii juillet 1990 tendant à réprimer tout acte raciste, antisémite ou xénophobe" (in French). Légifrance. Retrieved 2009-05-29 .
  34. ^ Timmermann, Wibke G (2014). Incitement in International Police force. Abingdon, Oxon, England: Routledge. p. 139. ISBN9781138020801.
  35. ^ Shoshan, Nitzan (2008), Reclaiming Germany: Young Right Extremists, the Return of the Nation, and the Land of Politics on the Streets of East Berlin, vol. 1, Chicago, Illinois: The Academy of Chicago, p. 183, ISBN9780549931096
  36. ^ a b c d Bohlander, Michael (1998), Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz: GERMAN CRIMINAL Code [Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection: GERMAN CRIMINAL CODE], Federal Ministry of Justice, Germany, para. 130
  37. ^ a b c d Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz: Strafgesetzbuch [Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection: Criminal Lawmaking] (in German), Federal Ministry of Justice, Federal republic of germany, para. 130
  38. ^ "§ 6 Völkermord" (in High german). Bundesministerium der Justiz. Retrieved 2009-05-29 .
  39. ^ "§ 189 Verunglimpfung des Andenkens Verstorbener" (in German language). Bundesministerium der Justiz. Retrieved 2016-06-26 .
  40. ^ "§ 194 Strafantrag" (in High german). Bundesministerium der Justiz. Retrieved 2009-05-29 .
  41. ^ Pichent, Michelle 50. (2003) "A Fertile basis: The Expansion of Holocaust Denial into the Arab Globe" Boston College Third World Law Review five.23 n.four
  42. ^ "Greece Passes Neb Making Holocaust-Denial Illegal, Tougher Anti-Racism Laws". Website. Reuters. ix September 2014. Retrieved xx June 2016.
  43. ^ "Article ii Law 927/1979". 16 March 2015.
  44. ^ "Historians against Commodity ii of anti-racist police force". two September 2014.
  45. ^ "'German historian Heinz Richter acquitted regarding his book on the boxing of Crete'". x February 2016.
  46. ^ "Professor Richter not guilty".
  47. ^ "Rhetoric of hate and racist speech in Hellenic republic". xi March 2018.
  48. ^ "Hungary criminalises holocaust denial". The Independent. Associated Printing. 23 Feb 2010. Retrieved six April 2016.
  49. ^ President Sólyom signs Holocaust deprival nib Archived 2011-08-10 at the Wayback Machine, politics.hu
  50. ^ "Fidesz-szigor a Btk-ban: börtön a kommunista bűnök tagadásáért". nol.hu. NOL. 21 May 2010.
  51. ^ Bennettsmith, Meredith (February 2, 2013). "Hungary Criminalizes Holocaust Deprival, Orders Man To Visit Memorial". Huffington Post.
  52. ^ "A Kuruc.info cikke az első, amit betiltottak Magyarországon". ORIGO. January xiv, 2015.
  53. ^ "Jogsegélyt kínál a TASZ a Kuruc.info-nak". ORIGO. Jan fifteen, 2015.
  54. ^ ""Jogsegélyt ajánl a Kuruc.infónak a TASZ" – nem kérünk belőle". Kuruc.info. January 15, 2015.
  55. ^ "Denial of Holocaust -Prohibition- Police force- 5746-1986-". State of israel Ministry building of Foreign Diplomacy. Retrieved 2009-05-30 .
  56. ^ JTA (2016-06-10). "Italy's parliament approves pecker criminalizing Holocaust denial". The Times of State of israel . Retrieved 2018-09-thirteen .
  57. ^ LEGGE 16 giugno 2016, northward. 115 - Modifiche all'articolo 3 della legge xiii ottobre 1975, n. 654, in materia di contrasto e repressione dei crimini di genocidio, crimini contro l'umanita' e crimini di guerra, come definiti dagli articoli half-dozen, 7 eastward viii dello statuto della Corte penale internazionale. (16G00124) (GU Serie Generale n.149 del 28-06-2016)
  58. ^ "Liechtensteinisches Landesgesetzblatt" (in German). LLV Authorities Portal. Retrieved 2009-05-31 .
  59. ^ "LIETUVOS RESPUBLIKOS BAUDŽIAMASIS KODEKSAS" (in Lithuanian). Retrieved 2012-01-22 .
  60. ^ a b c "Grand duchy of luxembourg – National Legal Measures". Quango of Europe. Retrieved 2009-05-31 .
  61. ^ "Denying holocaust 'non a crime': VVD". DutchNews.nl. May 27, 2009. Retrieved 2009-05-31 .
  62. ^ "Dutch Liberal leader: Holocaust Deprival should Not exist Crime". tripolipost.com. May 29, 2009. Archived from the original on July 17, 2011. Retrieved 2009-05-31 .
  63. ^ "Wetboek van Strafrecht (Sr), Artikel 137c" (in Dutch). www.wetboek-online.nl. Retrieved 2009-05-31 .
  64. ^ "Wetboek van Strafrecht (Sr), Artikel 137d" (in Dutch). www.wetboek-online.nl. Retrieved 2009-05-31 .
  65. ^ * (in English) old Human action of 18 December 1998 on the Plant of National Remembrance – Commission for Prosecution of Crimes against the Shine Nation Archived October xx, 2007, at the Wayback Machine. Institute of National Remembrance. Retrieved May 31, 2009.
    • (in Shine) Ustawa z dnia 18 grudnia 1998 r. o Instytucie Pamięci Narodowej – Komisji Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu Archived September 30, 2007, at the Wayback Auto. Sejm of the Republic of Poland, click tekst ujednolicony to see human action. Retrieved May 31, 2009.
  66. ^ "Código Penal português (texto oficial)" (PDF) (in Portuguese). Diário da República. September iv, 2007. pp. 57–58. Retrieved 2009-05-31 .
  67. ^ "ORDONANTA DE URGENTA nr. 31 din thirteen martie 2002" (PDF) (in Romanian). Romanian Government Department for Interethnic Relations. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 28, 2009. Retrieved 2009-05-31 .
  68. ^ Marica, Irina (v February 2021). "Bucharest court rules outset sentence for Holocaust denial in Romania". Romania Insider.
  69. ^ "Holocaust Deniers in Russian federation Now Confront Five Years in Prison house Reuters". Website. Reuters. 5 May 2014. Retrieved 20 June 2016.
  70. ^ "Tribunal Constitucional". Constitutional Courtroom of Espana. November vii, 2007. Archived from the original on January 20, 2012. Retrieved 2012-02-19 .
  71. ^ Uni, Assaf (November 10, 2007). "Castilian court rules out jail sentences for Holocaust denial". Haaretz. Archived from the original on September 17, 2008. Retrieved 2009-06-01 .
  72. ^ "Código Penal" (in Spanish). juridicas.com. Retrieved 2015-01-08 .
  73. ^ "SR 311.0 Fine art. 261bis Rassendiskriminierung (Schweizerisches Strafgesetzbuch)" (in German). Swiss Confederation. Retrieved 2009-06-01 .
  74. ^ "Ukraine's Parliament Passes Bill Banning Anti-Semitism". RadioFreeEurope RadioLiberty. 2021-09-22. Retrieved 2022-03-15 .
  75. ^ "Alison Chabloz has anti-Semitic songs conviction upheld". BBC News. 13 Feb 2019.
  76. ^ Kahn, Robert A. "Holocaust Deprival". www.mtsu.edu . Retrieved xiv June 2020.
  77. ^ "California Judge Rules Holocaust Did Happen". The New York Times. Associated Printing. October 10, 1981. p. A26. Retrieved November 20, 2010.
  78. ^ Mel Mermelstein v. Plant for Historical Review (1981), Superior Courtroom of Los Angeles Canton .
  79. ^ Joint action to combat racism and xenophobia Archived 2009-03-11 at the Wayback Machine. Europa.eu. July 27, 2005. Retrieved June 2007.
  80. ^ 31996F0443. Eur-lex.Europa.eu. July 24, 1996. Retrieved June 2007.
  81. ^ "Push for Eu Holocaust denial ban", BBC News, Jan 15, 2007. Retrieved 2009-11-15.
  82. ^ "European union diplomats: Ban on Holocaust denial won't curb civil liberties", Haaretz, Apr 17, 2004. Retrieved 2009-eleven-fifteen.
  83. ^ "EU agrees new racial hatred law", BBC News, April 19, 2007. Retrieved 2009-11-15.
  84. ^ Bilefsky, Dan. "EU adopts measure outlawing Holocaust deprival", The New York Times, April 19, 2007. Retrieved 2009-11-15.
  85. ^ "Suspected Holocaust denier Dr Gerald Toben wins extradition fight". The Daily Telegraph. London. October 29, 2008. Retrieved April 14, 2008.
  86. ^ "EU Justice Ministers concur on racism and xenophobia proposal". European Wedlock @ United Nations. Apr 19, 2007. Archived from the original on July 20, 2011. Retrieved 2009-06-01 .
  87. ^ "Pastörs v. Germany", European Courtroom of Human being Rights, decided on Oct three, 2019. Retrieved 2019-10-08.
  88. ^ "Holocaust denial is not protected by the European Convention on Man Rights", European Court of Human Rights, Oct 3, 2019. Retrieved 2019-x-08.
  89. ^ "Le Pen Bedevilled for Racial Hatred", Associated Printing, June 2, 1999. Retrieved 2009-11-14.
  90. ^ "Le Pen fined over Holocaust remarks". BBC. BBC. Retrieved 6 April 2016.
  91. ^ "Writer fined for Holocaust writings", BBC News, February 27, 1998. Retrieved 2009-11-15.
  92. ^ Blackness, Edwin. "Denial of Holocaust nix new in Islamic republic of iran / Ties to Hitler led to plots against British and Jews" [ dead link ] , San Francisco Chronicle, January 8, 2006.
  93. ^ "Holocaust Revisionists Will Serve Time", The Spokesman-Review (Associated Printing), July 21, 1998. Retrieved 2009-11-xv.
  94. ^ Francillon, Claude. "A Lyon, 50'éditeur chômeur Jean Plantin jugé cascade contestation de crimes contre l'humanité", Le Monde, September 9, 1999. Retrieved 2009-11-xv.
  95. ^ "Holocaust revisionist sentenced", BBC News, April 11, 2000. Retrieved 2009-11-xv.
  96. ^ Traynor, Ian. "Irving jailed for denying Holocaust", The Guardian, February 21, 2006. Retrieved 2009-11-13.
  97. ^ "German language Holocaust Denier Imprisoned for Inciting Racial Hatred", Deutsche Welle, March 16, 2007. Retrieved 2009-11-14.
  98. ^ Stalinsky, Steven. "The Influence of a Human being Who Denies the Holocaust" New York Dominicus, October 12, 2006. Retrieved 2009-11-14.
  99. ^ "Holocaust denier in Germany sentenced to five years in prison – Europe – International Herald Tribune", The New York Times, February 15, 2007. Retrieved 2009-eleven-14
  100. ^ Valérie Igounet, Robert Faurisson. Portrait d'un négationniste, Paris, 2012, p.382 (ISBN 978-2207259986)
  101. ^ "Austrian Holocaust denier gets six-and-a-half years in prison" Archived January 7, 2010, at the Wayback Machine European Jewish Press, Jan xiv, 2008. Retrieved 2009-11-xv.
  102. ^ "German language Neo-Nazi Lawyer Sentenced for Denying Holocaust" Deutsche Welle, Jan xiv, 2008. Retrieved 2009-11-fifteen.
  103. ^ "Horst Mahler zu hoher Haftstrafe verurteilt" Archived April 14, 2009, at the Wayback Motorcar, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, March 11, 2009. Retrieved 2009-11-14.
  104. ^ "Written report on the Trial of Dirk Zimmerman (Germany)" Archived 2009-11-03 at the Wayback Machine, Occidental Quarterly, October 25, 2009. Retrieved 2009-11-15.
  105. ^ "German language court tells holocaust denier he must face trial", Deutsche Welle, November 10, 2009. Retrieved 2009-11-14.
  106. ^ "European Courtroom of Human Rights: Holocaust Denial is Not Protected Free Oral communication", European Court of Man Rights, October three, 2019. Retrieved 2019-x-08.
  107. ^ "Hungary orders Holocaust denier to visit Auschwitz ", The Jerusalem Mail, February three, 2013. Retrieved 2013-07-06.
  108. ^ "Le négationniste Vincent Reynouard de nouveau condamné à la prison ferme", Le Monde, Feb 11, 2015. Retrieved 2015-02-15.
  109. ^ "Amtsgericht Hamburg: 87-jährige Holocaust-Leugnerin zu zehn Monaten Haft verurteilt", Der Spiegel, Nov 12, 2015. Retrieved 2015-11-12.
  110. ^ Mchangama, Jacob (2 October 2016). "First They Came for the Holocaust Deniers, and I Did Not Speak Out". Foreign Policy.

External links [edit]

  • Jonathan Josephs, Holocaust Deprival Legislation – A justifiable infringement of freedom of speech? (Université Libre de Bruxelles; Working Papers du Eye Perelman de philosophie du droit, due north° 2008/iii)
  • Voices on Antisemitism Interview with Brigitte Zypries from the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum

beardgreentrion.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_Holocaust_denial

Post a Comment for "What Countries Is It Illegal to Deny the Holocaust"